ambivalent imbroglio home

« Crazy Time | Main | Less than a week »

October 30, 2003

First Feedback

Caution: This post may contain higher than normal doses of whining.

We got our first memo back the other day and it was a bit humbling. As a former English/writing teacher, I feel a bit of pressure to do well in the legal writing aspect of law school. But more important, I, like so many others, would love to work for a journal, and in my third year I'd like to be a writing TA for the introductory LR&W sections (GW calls them "Dean's Fellows"). Of course, those goals would seem more realistic if I did well in my own legal writing assignments, and the first memo turned out, well, just ok. My writing is fine—no unnecessary passive voice, no filler, my memo is concise and precise. The problem: I didn't follow the right format.

The lesson is that in legal writing (or at least in my LR&W class), form is just as, if not more important than, function. You can communicate all your points clearly and concisely, but if you don't do it in the expected format, you'll do poorly. And that means following the format to the finest detail; virtually no deviation will go unpunished.

My instinctual reaction to that is resentment; I always taught my students that their primary goal should be to communicate clearly, and that form should follow function. However, I also taught them that good writing is all about pleasing the 800-lb gorilla, and if the gorilla wants your writing to take a certain form, you're not going to communicate clearly unless you follow that form. Too bad that lesson is sometimes hard to swallow.

I lost points for big things: My headings did not follow traditional outline format and I organized my discussion by level of authority rather than by legal issue. It made more sense to me to do it that way because several of the cases spoke to multiple issues. Oh well, I learned: Organize by issue.

I also lost points on some little things. My writing adjunct told us that our explanation should consist of paragraphs that begin with topic sentences that do not cite authority, but my writing TA didn't get that message and took points off for topic sentences with no citations. We were also supposed to use double-spaced, 12-pt, Times New Roman. I did, but since I use a Mac and Macs set type differently than does Windoze (and also maybe because there are multiple versions of Times New Roman produced by multiple font houses), my TA thought I'd cheated on font size and spacing to stay w/in the page limit. Strike another black mark on the long list of reasons the Microsoft computing hegemony is so so wrong.

But the font thing gets worse: When I explained the font size difference to my TA so she'd know for the next memo that I really am following the rules, she cautioned me that the judges of next spring's journals competition won't care about any explanations—if you don't set your type in 12-point Times New Roman (double-spaced) on a Windoze box (probably using MS Word), they will severely penalize your writing sample.

Hmph. That's good to know. Perhaps I should contact the people running the competition and ask them to be specific; if they're going to require people set their type on a Windoze machine they should say so, and if they're going to require competitors to use a specific word processor for setting that type, they should be clear about that, also. But that's the trouble with the Microsoft monopoly—the people running the journals competition probably won't feel a need to specify these things because they will assume everyone is going to use Windoze and Word. Yet they will penalize people who don't use Windoze and Word.

So not only does the Windoze monopoly potentially jeopardize national security, but it may also jeopardize my chances of writing onto a legal journal. Yay!

Posted October 30, 2003 06:56 AM | law school


Don't worry too much; you have a delightful writing style, and once you get the hang of the format you'll be able to write a killer brief.

Posted by: X at November 1, 2003 12:04 AM

You can fix your type face size problem by changing it to 12.5. When it prints it will look like Windows 12.

I want to ask you: Why don't you use WordPerfect? It might work for you.

Posted by: DG at November 1, 2003 10:45 AM

Thank you X, I hope you're right. I'm working on another memo right now, so we'll see.

And thank you DG, for the font size tip. I'll try that. Maybe I'll also look into WordPerfect and just quit my whining. I spoke w/some lawyers last night who were on journals when they were in school and they were all about following the rules. They said when they were competing the rules specified the space between lines of text in inches so you had to measure it with a ruler. They also said that once they were on the journals, they'd just dismiss (as in not even read) any article submissions that weren't perfectly formatted. Isn't it great that brilliant scholarship may never see the light of day simply because its author is not computer-savvy enough to format her writing correctly?

But I'm writing another memo now. I better go follow those rules....

Posted by: ambimb at November 2, 2003 06:41 AM


Ok, just a thought.

If information comes in the form that you expect it to come, it is a lot easier to digest. Think of it as getting a hamburger (from a chain) when you are in a real hurry. Yes, there is almost no way that the ingredients could not be arranged to make them tastier and more attractive.

But, changes are also the sort of thing that make it more time consuming.

It is just like the guy who when you ask them how it is going gives you a five minute response. Superior, perhaps, but is it the interaction you were expecting?

Be patient with yourself, do the usual, and you will be fine.

Interesting that they've dropped WordPerfect for Word. WP is better for legal writing, though WordXP is finally tolerable.

Forget Mac-centric thinking and keep your mind on providing output that looks like laserjet standard output -- your local federal court won't care if you have an excuse for why your document doesn't look right (the judge will think "she knew or should have known better") ... especially if he or she is trying to deal with fonts without reading glasses.

As for why the Mac guys ignored industry standards for fonts to do something "better" -- beats me. Usually it is the windows guys who are doing evil things.

Posted by: lawyer at November 2, 2003 06:48 AM

I actually wouldn't pay much attention to your legal writing class (other than doing what you need to for the grade). After the first memo, I pretty much ditched the whole IRAC thing because it drove me absolutely crazy. Yes, there are some conventions that you have to learn, but legal writing is like any other genre -- rules are really guidelines. The more good legal writing you read, and the more you improve your legal reasoning, the easier it will be for you to perfect your own legal style. Law is a language; you're going to learn it through reading first, writing second.

Posted by: tex at November 2, 2003 03:38 PM

about   ∞     ∞   archives   ∞   links   ∞   rss
This template highly modified from The Style Monkey.