« March 29, 2005 | Main | April 03, 2005 »
April 01, 2005
Arrogant and Out of Control
You know, I'm still surprised that I can be surprised by current political events, but today's Republican “leadership” just continues to amaze me. Check out what they're saying about the death of Terri Schaivo:Joining DeLay in taking issue with the judiciary was Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., who said, “The actions on the part of the Florida court and the U.S. Supreme Court are unconscionable.” Also, GOP Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina said the case “saw a state judge completely ignore a congressional committees subpoena and insult its intent” and “a federal court not only reject, but deride the very law that Congress passed.” DeLay said he would make sure that the GOP-controlled House “will look at an arrogant and out of control judiciary that thumbs its nose at Congress and the president.”First, you've clearly lost all perspective on how the American legal system works if you start declaring that it's “unconscionable” for judges to follow U.S. law and the requirements of the Constitution. Second, a U.S. Representative shows a grave lack of respect for both his own elected office and the judiciary by declaring that judges are “arrogant and out of control” just because they made decisions with which he disagrees. Such statements are not only reprehensible, they suggest a downright dangerous view of the principle of separation of powers. Would DeLay prefer a judiciary that simply asks “how high” every time Congress tells it to jump? Sorry, but our system is set up to give judges a healthy measure of insulation from political pressures precisely so that politicians can't tell judges how to decide controversial cases. Um, Tom? Maybe you should take a civics class or something, or maybe some pills. I'm sure there's some drug that could help with your egomania and delusions of grandeur. Finally, who is going to look into the arrogant and out of control Republican Congress that thumbs its nose at the Constitution and the American people? Sheesh.
Posted 09:48 AM | Comments (5) | general politics
Washington Lawyer: Do You Blog?
The Washington Lawyer's April cover story is entitled “Do You Blog?” Well, do you? The article was written by Sarah Kellogg and covers everything from the birth of blogs and RSS to the benefits and perils of professionals publishing online. It's a great article, but it would have been even better if it would have provided links to to all of the many blogs it mentions.* In case you'd like to check out the blogs mentioned in the article, they include:- Bag and Baggage by Denise Howell
- CrimLaw by Ken Lammers
- Fourth Amendment by John Wesley Hall, Jr.
- May It Please the Court by J. Craig Williams
- The Blawg Review by Stephanie Tai (not to be confused with, um, Blawg Review
- My Shingle by Carolyn Elefant
- Dennis Kennedy's blog (Kennedy calls Kellogg's article the best article he's read on blawging)
- The Trademark Blog by Martin Schwimmer
- SCOTUSBlog from Goldstein Howe
- Ernie the Attorney by Ernest Svenson
- The Statutory Construction Zone by Gary O’Connor
- Environmental Law Net (which seems to stretch the definition of “blog” a bit, it seems)
- Underneath Their Robes by Article III Groupie
- Blawg Wisdom, which links to content from many law students and legal practitioners
- Reid My Blawg! by Reid Trautz
- And several others that are linked at the end of the piece...
Posted 07:51 AM | Comments (2) | law general meta-blogging