ambivalent imbroglio home

« Librarians Wanted | Main | Toward Law »

August 14, 2002

Fear of "Signs"

To those of you who have seen and liked "Signs," please explain.

****** Potential Spoilers Below *******

My girlfriend and I saw "Signs" last night and we both thought it was about the most offensive, racist and xenophobic piece of sentimental propaganda to come out of Hollywood since... well, maybe since "Birth of A Nation." That might be an exaggeration, but I'm serious here— this movie was downright scary, and quadruply so when you think that it was a box-office winner this past weekend and yet there's no national outcry over the film's repulsive message. What is that message? Well, you tell me, because as my girlfriend and I cringed and guffawed at a show that everyone around us seemed gripped by, we gradually began to think we'd lost our minds.

The movie we saw looked like it was going to be a sort of campy parody of those who are terrified by "outsiders" (i.e., people of national and ethnic origin other than the U.S.) and the prospect of some force (i.e., terrorism, Al Qaeda) invading and destroying our peaceful and wholesome U.S. lives. The whole thing with the Doctor/wife-killer being the only non-white person in the show was such an obvious and racist decision on the part of the film's makers, that we just assumed that they were going to do something with the second half of the show to mock American racism and xenophobia. But no, it only got worse because the Doctor/wife-killer turns out to be a nice guy -- it's just that he couldn't help being bad because "it was meant to be." Translation: U.S. minorities aren't bad people, but they'll fuck up your life anyway because they just can't help it -- it's meant to be.

(I've since learned that the writer/director himself, M. Night Shyamalan, plays the Doctor/wife-killer, but that only adds to the bizarre horror at such a plot/characterization choice. The pseudo-"bad guy" in the film is a person of color, while all other major characters are white. This was an intentional choice. Why was this choice made?)

Then there's the whole "believe" thing. At first, judging from the whole scene on the couch where the Joaquin Pheonix character is begging Mel Gibson's character to give him some hope, this "spiritual" thread also looked like it was going to parody people who are saying we should do nothing about the problems in the world except pray and believe in a higher power so that if the shit hits the fan we'll see it as a "sign" of hope instead of becoming hopeless. That's what we thought, but no -- in the end, the movie reinforces this hokey "don't worry, be happy (and pray and believe)" message w/Pheonix lecturing Gibson in what is perhaps, save the bad aliens, the most unconvincing turn of bad acting in the whole film.

Finally, the "aliens" turn out to be terrorists (of course!), and since they're "aliens" we should feel free to just "swing away" at them if we don't like them or if we feel threatened by them. Translation in context of current events: It's ok for us to declare people "hostile combatants" and take away all their rights because they're not people, they're hostile combatants (didn't you get the memo?). It's also ok for the U.S. to bomb the shit out of (swing away at) anyone who seems even remotely threatening to anything we even remotely want or have an interest in.

Oh yeah, and when Gibson puts on the clerical collar at the end, I just burst out laughing -- it was so, so, so awful and predictable and unconvincing and... ugh! Needless to say, we got some disturbed looks moments later when the lights went up; apparently everyone else bought it.

Ok, so we left the theater thinking we were crazy, baffled that we hadn't heard anything about this awfulness before we saw the film. (Salon and Ebert both liked it, and neither said anything about it being racist/xenophobic, or campy.) So in order to maintain some sanity and find an explanation for this, here's what I'm hoping: Shyamalan originally wrote the parody that this movie flirts with being. Note that the aliens turn out to look like and do exactly what everyone in the movie fears the most, making it seem like the aliens are a product of the characters' imaginations -- thus, the movie attempts to mock xenophobia (at least in parts). Note also the campy, cartoony aliens who can be overcome just by splashing some water on them -- we can't be meant to take this at all seriously, right? So the movie was originally a super-parody of American xenophobia and racism, but then 9-11 happened and the studio (Disney, isn't it?) told Shyamalan he couldn't do a movie like that. So Shyamalan revised the script, built up the "believe, it was meant to be" thing, and the studio bought it. So now Shyamalan laughs bitterly all the way to the bank as U.S. audiences flock to this movie that only confirms their racism and xenophobia.


If you've seen this movie: Am I crazy, or what? How is this film not awful, offensive, and scary in a much more real way than little green men and UFOs will ever be?

Posted August 14, 2002 11:48 AM | ai movies


ok, i think you have read too much into the movie. first of all, why would you go to see it assuming that it would be a campy parody of american racism and xenophobia? how could you even have known that it would have potentially racist aspects unless you had seen the movie, thus knowing that the wife-killer wouldn't be white? so i don't buy that argument. it seems that you are attempting to post a neo-political, p.c. rant of the kind that is so polular in modern culture for reasons unapparent . shyamalan himself is not white, indian, i believe, and would probably not produce a movie with such racial insinuations, especially not after his other movie, the 6th sense; its just not his style.
so its too bad that you didnt like the movie, but theres no need for leftist, pretentious fuming; your (supposed) interpretation of the film is ridiculous.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 22, 2003 06:50 PM

"The whole thing with the Doctor/wife-killer being the only non-white person in the show was such an obvious and racist decision on the part of the film's makers."

I hate to be the one to tell you, but the doctor/wife-killer was the film maker himself: M. Night Shyamalan. He wrote and directed this movie AND played the role of the killer.

Maybe his point was to highlight the way people react to outsiders and the unknown.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 21, 2004 12:55 PM

"The whole thing with the Doctor/wife-killer being the only non-white person in the show was such an obvious and racist decision on the part of the film's makers."

I hate to be the one to tell you, but the doctor/wife-killer was the film maker himself: M. Night Shyamalan. He wrote and directed this movie AND played the role of the killer.

Maybe his point was to highlight the way people react to outsiders and the unknown.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 21, 2004 12:55 PM

Yes, indeedy, this I know, as I mentioned in the post. And like I said, I hoped/thought Shyamalan's point was, as you put it, "to highlight the way people react to outsiders and the unknown," but the film did more than "highlight" xenophibia, it seemed to endorse it. As an earlier commentor pointed out, perhpas I'm reading too much into the film. But then again, our own biases can be the most difficult to see, can't they? That's the nature of ideology -- it's invisible. If "Signs" just confirmed the worldview of most of its viewers, none of them would object to it, would they? And I heard very few objections...

Posted by: ambimb at March 21, 2004 02:30 PM

about   ∞     ∞   archives   ∞   links   ∞   rss
This template highly modified from The Style Monkey.