ambivalent imbroglio home

« You need backup | Main | Game Day »

April 26, 2004

Practice Testing

In a review session this morning w/Prof. CivPro she said we shouldn't worry overly much about things we didn't spend a lot of time on. For example, she said, we just rushed through preclusion doctrine at the end, so it probably won't be a very prominent feature of the final.

Guess what's featured in nearly every single practice exam she's made available? That's right: Preclusion doctrine.

Thanks.

Posted April 26, 2004 04:35 PM | law school


Prof Torts said same thing during review session last semester. We barely touched on comparative and contributory negligence. Guess what a good chunk of the exam was? You got it!
And we spent maybe a couple of days on it during the semester.
Rule #1 for law school exams- never trust the professor when s/he says their exam will emphasize what they emphasized in class.

Posted by: justin at April 26, 2004 10:39 PM

I pray you're wrong about that. The exam is in seven hours and I'm not going to become a preclusion pro in that time. Oh well...

Now that I think about it, our ProfTorts did something very similar with the same topic. I thought it was just him because he was such an inconsiderate and pompous teacher, but perhaps there's a theme here.

Posted by: ambimb at April 27, 2004 06:10 AM

Theme= torts professors are liars

Posted by: justin at April 27, 2004 12:21 PM

about   ∞     ∞   archives   ∞   links   ∞   rss
This template highly modified from The Style Monkey.